The following is a reprint of the letter from the editor of the 2017 first quarter edition of Perspectives in Healing. It was written by the Executive Director of Healing Beyond Borders, Lisa Anselme, who is an inspiring colleague and friend. It has been published here with her permission. When I first read it, Lisa so eloquently captured many of my thoughts and feelings in the current climate, that I wanted to share her writing here.
While preparing for the January 21st Women’s March on Denver, in solidarity with the Women’s March on Washington, DC, I had no idea that more than 200,000 women, men and children would peaceably march through Denver, singing, holding signs and gathering, or that marches would be held in cities throughout the world on all seven continents. As I spoke to others about this march, the question arose as to why I was marching; it seemed an important question to answer and caused me to consider how my core beliefs and values—that all beings and our planet deserve our respect, equality, dignity and justice—have been honed and established. My core beliefs aligned with the mission and vision of the march, that “we are all relevant, we are all valued and we are more powerful together,” 1 and were ultimately inspiring me to listen to the clarion call to action within my own heart’s song.
Setting the Political Core in the Land of Lincoln – Equal Rights and Liberty
Historians tend to portray the 1950s as a decade of prosperity, conformity and consensus; the 1960s as a decade of turbulence, protest and disillusionment;2 and the 1970s as a “pivot of change” in world history with feminism, civil rights for African Americans and Native Americans, Gay Rights and anti-war and environmental movements. I have to consider the irony and symbolism of being born in a city named “Freeport,” in Northern Illinois, known as the “Land of Lincoln,” and growing up in a time spanning these three decades.
We were surrounded and greatly influenced by the legacy of United States’ 16th President Abraham Lincoln, known as “Honest Abe,” consistently ranked by scholars and the public as one of the top U.S. presidents.3 Lincoln, a self taught lawyer, passed the bar exam and practiced law in Springfield, Illinois and was elected to the Illinois House of Representatives (1834–1842). In 1854, he became a strong opponent of the expansion of slavery and a leader in building the new Republican Party. Following seven highly publicized debates in Illinois with opponent Democrat and Populist Stephen A. Douglas (the second debate was held in my birth town, which is replete with a marker and statue), Lincoln lost the election to the U.S. Senate. In 1860, however, he won the Republican Party nomination and, by appealing to and gaining the confidence and support of the American people with his powers of oratory, won the U.S. Presidential election (by both popular and Electoral College votes). The majority of the Southern slave states were publicly threatening to leave the U.S. Union if the Republicans, perceived at the time as the anti-slavery party, won the presidency. Lincoln’s election prompted seven Southern slave states to secede from the Union and form the Confederate States of America (Confederacy), naming Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as their president, even before President Lincoln had moved into the White House. Known as a “Moderate Republican,” Lincoln was faced with confronting both “Radical Republicans” and “War Democrats” who demanded harsher treatment of the South, anti-war Democrats called “Copperheads” who despised him and “Southern Secessionists” who reportedly and consistently plotted his assassination. 4, 5, 6
On April 12, 1861, an attack by Confederate artillery on Federal Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor initiated the American Civil War, known as the War Between the States. On January 1, 1863, President Lincoln issued a controversial executive order, the Emancipation Proclamation that proclaimed the freedom of slaves in ten states that were in open rebellion to the Union.7 (The President had war powers authority only to suppress rebellion, thus only those states were targeted.) Following the battle of Gettysburg, Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address in November of 1863, which is now inscribed upon the Lincoln Memorial and became an “iconic endorsement for the principles of nationalism, republicanism, equal rights, liberty and democracy.”8
Four years after the start of the Civil War, General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate army surrendered only his army to Union General Ulysses S. Grant on April 9, 1865, initiating a line of subsequent surrenders that occurred over the next 16 months, even as President Lincoln, now into his second term of office, was promoting a moderate view of Reconstruction and reuniting of the nation. Five days later, on April 14, 1865, Lincoln was assassinated by a purported Confederate sympathizer; Vice President Andrew Johnson became acting president. On August 20, 1866, President Johnson issued Proclamation 157, announcing the end of the American Civil War, “Declaring that Peace, Order, Tranquility, and Civil Authority Now Exists in and Throughout the Whole of the United States of America.” 9
Political historian Thomas A. Bailey of Stanford University wrote that Lincoln was “undeniably a great man…in spirit, in humility, in humanity, in magnanimity, in patience, in Christ-like charity, in capacity for growth, in political instincts, in holding together a discordant political following, in interpreting and leading public opinion and in seizing with bulldog grip the essential idea of preserving the Union.”10
The loss of human lives and subsequent impact of emotional trauma upon this nation from this War Between the States was and remains enormous. The divisions of beliefs and perspectives have once again emerged to challenge our nation. Of note is that a newly estimated death toll of Union and Confederate soldiers by David Hacker, a demographic historian from Binghamton University in New York, has now been recalculated and increased from 620,000 to 750,000.11
Setting the Spiritual Core with the Brethren
My core spiritual training was established by happenstance and perhaps good fortune. My mother, a Methodist, and my father, an agnostic who erroneously called himself an atheist and often commented that he could not abide hypocritical persons of faith who did not practice what they preached, offered a diverse view of a power higher than myself. They became members of a small Church of the Brethren through a neighbor’s invitation; their participation in this church was as much for socialization and community as it was for any faith belief.
I liked this church—the parishioners grooved on Jesus and the New Testament—and was baptized in this church following a year of catechism. The Brethren believe in full submersion baptism and evangelism through the personal practice and action of performing good deeds in the greater world community and through non-confrontational witnessing. Brethren are committed to pacifism and nonviolent resolution of conflict, expressed through antiwar and peace efforts around the world, as well as through refusal to engage in voluntary or mandatory military service. Brethren were imprisoned for these refusals; however, some Brethren did serve as chaplains or medics. One of the three designated historic peace churches, which also includes the Quakers and the Mennonites, they believe strongly in community; are very involved in disaster relief and other charitable works; believe in peaceful resolution whether in relationships, international conflicts or treatment of citizens and prisoners;12 and often describe themselves by what they do through their service rather than by what they believe.
This church was a touch point during the era of the Vietnam War and corresponding protests. A church friend’s son registered as a conscientious objector and many questioned his sincerity, believing he was simply being a coward and a draft dodger. I couldn’t vouch for the young man’s motivations or patriotism, yet believed there was validity in questioning the rightness of war and, in particular, that war. As a teenager, questioning that war was not a popular position among the greater public at that time.
A number of us were also active in the Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA), described as the oldest and largest multicultural women’s organization in the world. It has been at the fore and a pioneer of “most major movements within the U.S. in race relations, labor union representation and the empowerment of women and diversity, and works to create opportunities for women’s growth, leadership and power in order to attain a common vision: peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all people.”13 I had the wonderful privilege to attend conferences for civil rights and share deep friendships under the guidance of a great youth director. Indeed, somewhere in an old storage box is a Quad City Times front page picture of myself and other teens holding protest signs as a small number of us marched to protest racism following a Midwest YWCA conference on race relations and discrimination.
Setting the Educational Core – Justice and Civil Rights
Activism, humanitarianism and justice were part of this volatile era and expressed in our high school student council activities, including our initiation of an all school assembly to the 1500 plus racially mixed students in which we examined and educated ourselves about the issue of racism. A number of fellow students on this council went on to become highly respected attorneys, judges and mediators. A number of us went on to become health care professionals. I would go so far as to say that service and justice was infused into our blood.
In college in the 70s, when taking respite from pre-med and science courses, my mental escape was through the arts and humanities via music, philosophy and psychology courses. Courses such as “Feminist Criticism of the Bible” and ones that explored alternate states of reality with readings from authors such as anthropologist Carlos Castaneda, challenged fixed ideas about both the visible and unseen world. Thanks to this background exposure and several dear friends who thought I would make a “good nurse,” transferring majors to the nursing profession offered the necessary mix of art and science, humanitarianism and service that captured my passion and engagement. Later studies in holism and other Eastern spiritual traditions caused me to stretch beyond the seemingly apparent differences in these conceptual frameworks into a much broader world view—one in which all spiritual traditions ultimately appeared designed to move humanity towards loving and caring for one another.
One teacher along the way shared the belief that structured religion and group membership afforded us the opportunity to learn discipline and obedience, whereas spirituality afforded us the opportunity to establish a direct line to an expression of Source within ourselves, all beings and the cosmos. These studies and the practice of nursing ultimately led me into the world of energy healing and a deep dive into the study of ethics and its interplay with a humane, conscious and energetic world.
The Next Harmonic
In returning to the question of why I marched, it has became apparent that there was a rich exposure given to me of other viewpoints, role models and teachers who demanded that I consider the well being of not only myself, but others. I marched for them, for her, for him, for my brothers and sisters, for the ancestors, for the four-leggeds, for the water beings, for the water, for the skies, for the winged ones and for the earth. I marched as a mother, a healer, a nurse, a daughter, a sister, a woman, a human being, a Christian, a Buddhist, a respecter of all religions, a light worker, a steward of this planet, a world citizen, and an advocate for compassion and unconditional love.
I marched to blend my voice in song with the diverse and vibrant voices of others around the globe, to uplift and support human rights, equality and social justice. I marched toward the creation of the Next Harmonic.
- Gugliotta, G. (4/2/2012) New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll New York Times